Affiliation:
1. Sciences Po, Paris CEE / LIEPP, and University of Gothenburg, CERGU
Abstract
The literature on party competition structure in eastern Europe varies between aggregated large-N studies that propose uniform patterns of party competition across the region on the one hand, and disaggregated, case-focused studies identifying a plurality of country-specific patterns on the other. This article finds that both suffer from theoretical weaknesses. The aggregated works, arguing for common unidimensionality of party competition in the region, overlook significant cross-national differences, while the case-focused works, suggesting country-specific multidimensionality, do not identify commonalities. In effect, both sets of research fall short in explaining the variance of party competition in eastern Europe. This article consequently argues for the importance of bridging these findings of aggregate uniformity and idiosyncratic diversity through the use of refined theoretical explanations of party competition patterns in the region. To demonstrate the plausibility and utility of such an approach, the article builds a theoretical model of party competition in eastern Europe, and tests it by estimating the vote for left-wing parties across ten eastern European countries using the 2009 European Election Study.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
54 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Estonian Russians;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09
2. Slovak Hungarians;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09
3. Ethnicity and Democratic Resilience Individual Analyses;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09
4. Ethnicity and New Issues;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09
5. Original Surveys;Ethnic Minorities, Political Competition, and Democracy;2024-07-09