Comparing Treatment Outcomes in Children and Adolescents With ADHD to Other Disorders Within an Australian and Dutch Outpatient Cohort

Author:

Payne Leanne1ORCID,Roest Sanna L.2,Lu Zhen Qi1,Zendarski Nardia3ORCID,Bisset Matthew4ORCID,Sciberras Emma345ORCID,Stathis Stephen16,Siebelink Bart M.2,Vermeiren Robert R. J. M.27,Bellgrove Mark A.8,Coghill David3,Middeldorp Christel M.16

Affiliation:

1. University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia

2. Leiden University, The Netherlands

3. University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia

4. Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia

5. Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Australia

6. Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Australia

7. Parnassia Groep, Hague, The Netherlands

8. Monash University, Melbourne, Clayton, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Objective: Previous studies at child and youth mental health services (CYMHS) suggest that children with ADHD have poorer outcomes compared to those with other diagnoses. This study investigates this in more detail. Methods: Children with ADHD were compared to those with ASD and those with emotional disorders, on routinely collected outcomes at CYMHS in Australia ( N = 2,513) and the Netherlands ( N = 844). Results: Where the emotional disorders group reached a similar level of emotional symptoms at the end-of-treatment as the ADHD and ASD groups, the latter two groups still had higher scores on ADHD and ASD symptoms (attention and peer problems). The poorer outcomes were mainly explained by higher severity at baseline. In Australia, an ADHD and/or ASD diagnosis also independently contributed to worse outcomes. Conclusion: Those with neurodevelopmental disorders within both countries had poorer outcomes than those with emotional disorders. Services should aim to optimize treatment to ensure best possible outcomes.

Funder

department of health, australian government

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3