A Regional ADHD Center-Based Network Project for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Children and Adolescents With ADHD

Author:

Bonati Maurizio1,Reale Laura1,Zanetti Michele1,Cartabia Massimo1,Fortinguerra Filomena1,Capovilla Giuseppe2,Chiappedi Matteo3,Costantino Antonella4,Effedri Paola5,Luoni Chiara6,Martinelli Ottaviano7,Molteni Massimo8,Ottolini Alberto9,Saccani Monica10,

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory for Mother and Child Health, IRCCS—Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri,” Milan, Italy

2. Child Neuropsychiatry Department, Poma Hospital, Mantova, Italy

3. Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit, National Neurological Institute C. Mondino, Pavia, Italy

4. Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, IRCCS Foundation Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy

5. Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, Children Hospital, Brescia, Italy

6. Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, De Ponte Hospital, Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy

7. Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, Manzoni Hospital, Lecco, Italy

8. Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, IRCCS Foundation Eugenio Medea, Bosisio Parini (LC), Italy

9. Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Milan, Italy

10. Child and Adolescent Neuropsychiatric Unit, San Paolo Hospital, Milan Italy

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to define the sociodemographic, clinical, and prescription profiles of the participants enrolled in the Italian Lombardy ADHD Register. Method: Data on patients evaluated by the 18 regional ADHD reference centers in the 2012 to 2013 period were analyzed. Results: Seven hundred fifty-three of 1,150 (65%) suspected patients received a diagnosis of ADHD. In 24% of cases, there was a family history of ADHD. Four hundred eighty-three (64%) patients had at least one psychopathological disorder, the more common of which were learning disorders (35%). Eighty-four percent of patients received a prescription for psychoeducational interventions, 2% received only pharmacological treatment, and 14% a combination of both. Compared with patients treated with psychoeducational intervention alone, patients with drug prescriptions more commonly presented values of Clinical Global Impressions - Severity scale (CGI-S) of 5 or higher ( p < .0001). Conclusion: A continuous and systematic monitoring of patterns of care is essential in promoting significant improvements in clinical practice and ensuring an efficient and homogeneous quality of care.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3