Challenges to determining adolescent medication response in an outpatient clinical setting: Comparing Adderal and methylphenidate for ADHD

Author:

Barkley R. A.1,Connor D. F.,Kwasnik D.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655. Telephone: 508-856-5843; fax: 508-856-6426

2. Departments of Psychiatry and Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.

Abstract

This study sought to evaluate the utility of employing systematic assessments of stimulant medication response with teenagers with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in a routine outpatient clinic setting. In doing so, it compared the efficacy of Adderall and methylphenidate (MPH) for this age group. Thirty-five subjects were randomly assigned to and completed treatment within five different drug orders involving two doses of Adderall (5 mg BID & 10 mg BID) and two doses of MPH (5 mg BID & 10 mg BID) and a lactose placebo. Measures consisted of weekly parent and teacher ratings of ADHD and oppositional symptoms, parent, teen, and teacher ratings of side effects, and tests of inhibition and attention. At the group level of analysis, no significant medication effects could be detected on parent or teacher ratings, the latter occurring in part due to poor cooperation of teachers with the protocol. Significant improvements were found for the 10 mg dose of Adderall on the inhibition task but not on the attention task. Only teen self-report ratings of side effects revealed a significant drug effect. This suggested less severe side effects on the 10 mg Adderall dose than the 5 mg dose of MPH. Nevertheless, nonblinded global clinical judgments of improvement indicated that 46% of teens had an optimal response to Adderall, 40% had an optimal response to MPH, and 14% did not respond to either drug. It is concluded that both Adderall and MPH appear to be clinically effective in the treatment of ADHD in teenagers, based on clinician's global impressions. However, numerous logistical problems plague attempts by clinicians to systematically evaluate teen responding to stimulants in a routine outpatient setting using rating scales. Suggestions are offered as to how practitioners can improve the validity and utility of such systematic evaluations in routine office practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3