NIMH collaborative multimodal treatment study of children with ADHD (MTA): Design, methodology, and protocol evolution

Author:

Arnold L.E.,Abikoff H.B.,Cantwell D.P.,Conners C.K.,Elliott G.R.,Greenhill L.L.,Hechtman L.,Hinshaw S.P.,Hoza B.,Jensen P.S.,Kraemer H.C.,March J.S.,Newcorn J.H.,Pelham W.E.,Richters J.E.,Schiller E.,Severe J.B.,Swanson J.M.,Vereen D.,Wells K.C.

Abstract

The steering committee of the collaborative six-site Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (the MTA) had to develop a common protocol consistent with public health goals and with scientific and clinical state of the art. With the aid of statistical, educational, and public health consultation, the steering committee balanced the stated objectives of the RFA against budgetary, clinical, ethical, and logistical practicalities. Two primary questions will be addressed: (1) What is the relative long-term effectiveness of excellent medication vs. excellent behavioral treatment vs. the combination? (2) What is the relative long-term effective ness of each of these state-of-the art intense treatments vs. routine community care? In a parallel-group design, 576 children (96 at each site) age 7-9 in grades 1-4 are thoroughly assessed in multiple domains from multiple informants and randomized to 4 treatment conditions: a medication-alone strategy, a psychosocial-treatment-alone strategy, a combination strategy, and community comparison (assessment and referral). The first three groups are treated for 14 months and all are re-assessed periodically for 24 months. Each treatment strategy is multi-component, with compromises between clinical flexibility and cross-site uniformity supported by a multi-tiered supervisory/fidelity structure, including 10 manuals, weekly teleconference panels, site visits, circuit-riding consultants, and feedback loops from therapists and supervisors to the steering committee about clinical realities. The resulting data should not only answer the primary questions above, but also support secondary data analyses about the effect of comorbidity, sex, SES, and other subject characteristics on treatment outcome. The MTA should both provide conclusions useful to the practicing clinician and define questions for the next generation of investigations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cited by 48 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3