Quantifying the unfairness of the 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification

Author:

Csató László12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratory on Engineering and Management Intelligence, Research Group of Operations Research and Decision Systems, Institute for Computer Science and Control (SZTAKI), Eötvös Loránd Research Network (ELKH)

2. Department of Operations Research and Actuarial Sciences, Corvinus University of Budapest (BCE)

Abstract

This paper investigates the fairness of the 2018 FIFA World Cup qualifying competition via Monte Carlo simulations. The qualifying probabilities are calculated for 102 nations, all teams except for African and European countries. A method is proposed to quantify the degree of unfairness. Although the qualifications within four FIFA confederations are constructed fairly, serious differences are found between the continents: for instance, a South American team could have tripled its chances by playing in Asia. Choosing a fixed matchup in the inter-continental play-offs instead of the current random draw can reduce the unfairness of the competition. The move of Australia from the Oceanian to the Asian zone is shown to increase its probability of participating in the 2018 FIFA World Cup by about 65%. Our results provide important insights for the administrators on how to reallocate the qualifying berths.

Funder

Magyar Tudományos Akadémia

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference60 articles.

1. 8. Making the Beautiful Game a Bit Less Beautiful 124 (with Luis Garicano)

2. Football participation legacy and Australia’s qualification for the 2006 Football World Cup

3. Unfair play in World Cup qualification? An analysis of the 1998–2010 FIFA World Cup performances and the bias in the allocation of tournament berths

4. FIFA. FIFA Council confirms contributions for FIFA World Cup participants. http://web.archive.org/web/20200726200924/https://www.fifa.com/who-we-are/news/fifa-council-confirms-contributions-for-fifa-world-cup-participants-2917806 (2017, accessed 27 October).

5. Building Nations through Shared Experiences: Evidence from African Football

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3