Affiliation:
1. University of Tasmania, Australia
Abstract
There is increasing evidence fewer people are willing to discuss and debate issues of common concern on social media with their feeds becoming more conflict-laden and toxic. A more nuanced understanding is needed of the motivations and deterrents for individual participation, in different contexts. This article provides a unique perspective from regional Australia by considering the conditions under which a group of social media users in Launceston, Tasmania were more likely to participate in discussion on Facebook and the factors that encouraged participants to present a constructed version of themselves. In doing so, this digital ethnographic case study contributes to evidence about the limitations of Facebook as a place for democratic public debate and may have practical application by helping identify spaces on social media that are more likely to prompt open and honest discussion.
Reference53 articles.
1. ABS (2023) Public sector employment and earnings, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Available at: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/employment-and-unemployment/public-sector-employment-and-earnings/latest-release#employees
2. The Civil Sphere
3. Facebook, the Media and Democracy
4. Social Media Analysis and Public Opinion: The 2010 UK General Election
5. Baker E (2020) Who are Tasmania's political lobbysits? ABC News. Available at: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-22/who-are-tasmanias-political-lobbyists/12795452?nw=0