Abstract
President Nixon's re-election committee had in 1972 more than $50 million with which to wage its campaign against George McGovern. Because it was commonly presumed that Nixon would easily win the election, the "dirty tricks" and the Watergate burglary have been variously described as "irrational" and "illogical" acts, as well as inept campaign management. Observers of the 1972 campaign have assumed that the unfair campaign activities in 1972 were in duced by the abundance of campaign funds which the Republicans had. Ac cordingly, restrictions on campaign expenditures have been legislated. In this article, a theory of campaign expenditures is formulated, leading to an under standing ofpolitical expenditures on what are called "productive" and "preda tory" political strategies. With the model that is developed, alternative policies for reducing "predatory politics" are evaluated.
Reference7 articles.
1. The Economic Theory of Regulation and Public Financing of Presidential Elections
2. Money, Politics, and Democracy: A Review Essay
3. Bush, W.C. (1972) "Individual welfare in anarchy," pp. 5-18 in G. Tullock (ed.) Explorations in the Theory of Anarchy. Blacksburg, VA: Center for the Study of Public Choice .
4. Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N. J.) Case
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献