Abstract
To date, the distinction between money income and utility income has been recognized only in an efficiency context. This article argues that it is also srgnificant in an income redistribution context and can be used to identify the form which such redistribution is to take, cash or kind. To illustrate its practical significance, this distinction is shown to underlie the social evaluation of time savings which appear as benefits in many public transport investments. By imputation from past railway closure decisions in the United Kingdom, a value for time twice the conventional evaluation is obtained.
Reference15 articles.
1. Imputing weights behind past railway closure decisions within a cost–benefit framework
2. THE EXTERNALITY ARGUMENT FOR IN-KIND TRANSFERS: SOME CRITICAL REMARKS
3. Closure Legislation (1968) " Transport Act, section 53," pp. 1158-1160 in Halsbury's Statutes of England , Volume 26.
4. ——— (1962) "Transport Act, section 56," pp. 970-974 in Halsbury's Statutes of England, Volume 26.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献