Affiliation:
1. University of Akron
2. New Mexico State University
Abstract
This survey of 23 macroeconomics textbooks shows that many contain an analysis of inflation during the 1970s that is potentially misleading. The survey indicates the predominant textbook explanation of inflation in the 1970s is that price increases of imported oil caused supply-side shocks that led to cost-push inflation. The textbook oil story of inflation is frequently based on casual empiricism, often fails to directly integrate monetary policy, and could have been presented using the price of any basic imported commodity. The contention in this article is that the oil story of inflation is included in the textbooks, even if it is flawed and misleading, because it is a low-cost, easily understood explanation that is consistent with a Keynesian view of inflation. The oil story, moreover, is included in textbooks because it is considered an accurate story of inflation by nearly all authors. Personal correspondence with the textbook authors offers support for this explanation for inclusion of the oil story in the textbooks.
Subject
Public Administration,Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献