Human Echolocators Have Better Localization Off Axis

Author:

Thaler Lore1ORCID,Norman L. J.1,De Vos H. P. J. C.2,Kish D.3,Antoniou M.4,Baker C. J.4,Hornikx M. C. J.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Durham University

2. Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology

3. World Access for the Blind, Placentia, California

4. Department of Electronic Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Birmingham

Abstract

Here, we report novel empirical results from a psychophysical experiment in which we tested the echolocation abilities of nine blind adult human experts in click-based echolocation. We found that they had better acuity in localizing a target and used lower intensity emissions (i.e., mouth clicks) when a target was placed 45° off to the side compared with when it was placed at 0° (straight ahead). We provide a possible explanation of the behavioral result in terms of binaural-intensity signals, which appear to change more rapidly around 45°. The finding that echolocators have better echo-localization off axis is surprising, because for human source localization (i.e., regular spatial hearing), it is well known that performance is best when targets are straight ahead (0°) and decreases as targets move farther to the side. This may suggest that human echolocation and source hearing rely on different acoustic cues and that human spatial hearing has more facets than previously thought.

Funder

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council

department for business, innovation and skills

british council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Reference23 articles.

1. Arditi G., Weiss A. J., Yovel Y. (2015). Object localization using a biosonar beam: How opening your mouth improves localization. Royal Society Open Science, 2(8), Article 150225. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150225

2. Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute for Sound Research. (n.d.). Detailed description. https://www.oeaw.ac.at/isf/das-institut/software/hrtf-database/detailed-description

3. Austrian Academy of Sciences Institute for Sound Research. (2020). Index of /data/database/ari [Data set]. https://sofacoustics.org/data/database/ari/

4. Battal C., Occelli V., Bertonati G., Falagiarda F., Collignon O. (2020). General enhancement of spatial hearing in congenitally blind people. Psychological Science, 31(9), 1129–1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620935584

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3