The Value of Interracial Contact for Reducing Anti-Black Bias Among Non-Black Physicians: A Cognitive Habits and Growth Evaluation (CHANGE) Study Report

Author:

Onyeador Ivuoma N.1ORCID,Wittlin Natalie M.1,Burke Sara E.2,Dovidio John F.1,Perry Sylvia P.3,Hardeman Rachel R.4,Dyrbye Liselotte N.5,Herrin Jeph6,Phelan Sean M.7,van Ryn Michelle8

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Yale University

2. Department of Psychology, Syracuse University

3. Department of Psychology, Northwestern University

4. Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic

6. School of Medicine, Yale University

7. Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic

8. School of Nursing, Oregon Health Sciences University

Abstract

Although scholars have long studied circumstances that shape prejudice, inquiry into factors associated with long-term prejudice reduction has been more limited. Using a 6-year longitudinal study of non-Black physicians in training ( N = 3,134), we examined the effect of three medical-school factors—interracial contact, medical-school environment, and diversity training—on explicit and implicit racial bias measured during medical residency. When accounting for all three factors, previous contact, and baseline bias, we found that quality of contact continued to predict lower explicit and implicit bias, although the effects were very small. Racial climate, modeling of bias, and hours of diversity training in medical school were not consistently related to less explicit or implicit bias during residency. These results highlight the benefits of interracial contact during an impactful experience such as medical school. Ultimately, professional institutions can play a role in reducing anti-Black bias by encouraging more frequent, and especially more favorable, interracial contact.

Funder

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Cited by 83 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3