Encoding Context Determines Risky Choice

Author:

Madan Christopher R.1ORCID,Spetch Marcia L.2,Machado Fernanda M. D. S.3,Mason Alice3,Ludvig Elliot A.3

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology, University of Nottingham

2. Department of Psychology, University of Alberta

3. Department of Psychology, University of Warwick

Abstract

Both memory and choice are influenced by context: Memory is enhanced when encoding and retrieval contexts match, and choice is swayed by available options. Here, we assessed how context influences risky choice in an experience-based task in two main experiments (119 and 98 participants retained, respectively) and two additional experiments reported in the Supplemental Material available online (152 and 106 participants retained, respectively). Within a single session, we created two separate contexts by presenting blocks of trials in distinct backgrounds. Risky choices were context dependent; given the same choice, people chose differently depending on other outcomes experienced in that context. Choices reflected an overweighting of the most extreme outcomes within each local context rather than the global context of all outcomes. When tested in the nontrained context, people chose according to the context at encoding and not retrieval. In subsequent memory tests, people displayed biases specific to distinct contexts: Extreme outcomes from each context were more accessible and judged as more frequent. These results pose a challenge for theories of choice that rely on retrieval as guiding choice.

Funder

Leverhulme Trust

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Alberta Gambling Research Institute

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Context effects in cognitive effort evaluation;Psychonomic Bulletin & Review;2024-08-05

2. Memory Can Define Individual Beliefs and Identity—and Shape Society;Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences;2023-12-13

3. Rare and extreme outcomes in risky choice;Psychonomic Bulletin & Review;2023-11-16

4. The Future of Decisions From Experience: Connecting Real-World Decision Problems to Cognitive Processes;Perspectives on Psychological Science;2023-06-30

5. Am I Winning or Losing? Probing the Appraisal of Partial Wins via Response Vigor;Journal of Gambling Studies;2023-06-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3