Money Earlier or Later? Simple Heuristics Explain Intertemporal Choices Better Than Delay Discounting Does

Author:

Marzilli Ericson Keith M.12,White John Myles3,Laibson David24,Cohen Jonathan D.35

Affiliation:

1. School of Management, Boston University

2. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts

3. Department of Psychology, Princeton University

4. Department of Economics, Harvard University

5. Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University

Abstract

Heuristic models have been proposed for many domains involving choice. We conducted an out-of-sample, cross-validated comparison of heuristic models of intertemporal choice (which can account for many of the known intertemporal choice anomalies) and discounting models. Heuristic models outperformed traditional utility-discounting models, including models of exponential and hyperbolic discounting. The best-performing models predicted choices by using a weighted average of absolute differences and relative percentage differences of the attributes of the goods in a choice set. We concluded that heuristic models explain time-money trade-off choices in experiments better than do utility-discounting models.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Psychology

Cited by 99 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Exploring the demand for elective egg freezing: A laboratory experiment;Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics;2024-08

2. Attentional mechanisms of the date/delay effect in intertemporal choice: An eye-tracking study.;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition;2024-06-20

3. Attribute latencies causally shape intertemporal decisions;Nature Communications;2024-04-05

4. Creative evolution in economics;Journal of Evolutionary Economics;2024-04

5. Differences in Discounting Behavior and Brain Responses for Food and Money Reward;eneuro;2024-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3