Effect of the Contents in Advance Directives on Individuals’ Decision-Making

Author:

Park Jae Yoon1,Lim Chi-Yeon2,Puurveen Gloria3,Kim Do Yeun4,Lee Jae Hang5,Do Han Ho6,Kim Kyung Soo1,Yoo Kyung Don7,Kim Hyo Jin7,Kim Yunmi7,Shin Sung Joon13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Nephrology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

2. Clinical Trial Center, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

3. W. Maurice Young Center for Applied Ethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

4. Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

5. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

7. Department of Nephrology, Dongguk University Gyeongju Hospital, Dongguk University School of Medicine, Gyeongju, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Completing an advance directive offers individuals the opportunity to make informed choices about end-of-life care. However, these decisions could be influenced in different ways depending on how the information is presented. We randomly presented 185 participants with four distinct types of advance directive: neutrally framed (as reference), negatively framed, religiously framed, and a combination. Participants were asked which interventions they would like to receive at the end of life. Between 60% and 70% of participants responded “accept the special interventions” on the reference form. However, the majority (70%–90%) chose “refuse the interventions” on the negative form. With respect to the religious form, 70% to 80% chose “not decided yet.” Participants who refused special life-sustaining treatments were older, female, and with better prior knowledge about advance directives. Our findings imply that the specific content of advance directives could affect decision-making with regard to various interventions for end-of-life care.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Life-span and Life-course Studies,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Health (social science)

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3