Public Perceptions of Normal and Ideal Head Shape: A Crowdsourced Survey Analysis

Author:

Bins Griffin P.1ORCID,Newsom Megan2,Park Jungwon G.1,Hemal Kshipra3,Phelan Alannah L.4,Lalikos Janice F.4,Runyan Christopher M.1

Affiliation:

1. Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

2. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

3. NYU Langone Hospital, New York, NY, USA

4. UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA

Abstract

Background: Cephalic index (CI) is an objective measure of head shape used by craniofacial surgeons to support a diagnosis of head shape abnormality. However, the consensus on what values correspond to a normal head shape are changing following the Back to Sleep campaign. Recent work has shown an increase in mean CI from 74 to 84. Following this shift, no study has been undertaken to evaluate whether the perception of normal head shape has changed as well. Methods: About 1020 subjects, 18 or older, were recruited through Amazon Turk crowdsourcing platform. Subjects were asked to select the head shapes they considered most normal in a series of questions identifying ideal head shape in children 6 months or younger. Demographic information was recorded for study participants to identify differing ethnic perceptions of head shape. Results: The mean cephalic index preferred by a crowdsourced population was 81.84 (SD 2.48). There was a difference in mean preferred CI between people who identified as black (CI = 82.875) and people who identified as white (CI = 81.500; P = .00062). There was no difference in mean preferred CI between males and females. Education level, age healthcare occupation status, medical literacy, and work involving children did not affect preference. Conclusions: The typical head shape has changed following the Back to Sleep campaign and the current perception of head shape aligns with the newly described norm as opposed to the historic population data. Criteria for intervention and outcome goals should be adjusted accordingly.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,General Mathematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3