Telemedicine’s Impact on Patient Satisfaction and Efficiency in a Pediatric Plastic Surgery Practice

Author:

LaValley Myles N.1ORCID,Wright Matthew A.1,Nelson Ronald1,Kreber Lily2,Bogue Jarrod T.1,Imahiyerobo Thomas A.1

Affiliation:

1. Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA

2. The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

Abstract

Background: For decades, clinicians have cited telemedicine as a useful and effective tool for delivering care in surgical specialties. This study aims to investigate the direct impact of telemedicine on a pediatric plastic surgery practice, examining patient satisfaction and visit efficiency. Methods: Between March 2020 and May 2021, patient families were surveyed online regarding their visit, with questions surrounding convenience, ease of communication, ability to demonstrate physical exam findings, and likelihood of recommending the encounter format. Responses were compared between in-person and telemedicine visits. The duration of encounters during the study time period was also documented from the electronic medical record. Results: Ninety families (15.1%) completed the survey. Telemedicine visits were rated as more convenient than in-person visits (3.77 ± 0.51 vs 3.36 ± 0.94, P < .001). The ability to communicate in telemedicine was rated as similar to in-person ( P = .104), as was the likelihood to recommend that format ( P = .189). Quality of the physical exam was rated as worse for the telehealth visits (3.37 ± 0.89 vs 3.89 ± 0.35, P < .001). Of telemedicine participants, 7.5% also described connectivity issues and 3.8% reported audiovisual problems. Regarding visit efficiency, telehealth visits were shorter across all encounter types including follow-up (34.3 ± 81.1 vs 55.7 ± 44.1 minutes, P = .01), new patient (29.3 ± 25.5 vs 65.1 ± 43.4 minutes, P < .001), and postoperative (24.9 ± 22.9 vs 61.3 ± 48.8 minutes, P < .001) visits. Conclusion: Telemedicine provides an excellent modality for care delivery in the pediatric plastic surgery setting, minimizing time and inconveniences associated with presenting in-person. However, there remains clear concern about the efficacy of the physical examination and technological reliability from the patient’s perspective.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3