Toward developing consensus on family-centred care: An international descriptive study and discussion

Author:

Al-Motlaq Mohammad A1,Carter Bernie23ORCID,Neill Sarah45,Hallstrom Inger Kristensson6,Foster Mandie7,Coyne Imelda8ORCID,Arabiat Diana7ORCID,Darbyshire Philip910,Feeg Veronica D11,Shields Linda512ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Maternal Child and Family Health, Faculty of Nursing, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan

2. Faculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK

3. University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia

4. Faculty of Health and Society, University of Northampton, Northampton, UK

5. Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia

6. Lund University, Lund, Sweden

7. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Perth, Western Australia

8. Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

9. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash University, Victoria, Australia

10. Philip Darbyshire Consulting Ltd, South Australia, Australia

11. Center for Nursing Research, Molloy College, Rockville Centre, NY, USA

12. School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

Nurses around the world have described family-centred care (FCC) in various ways. With limited evidence regarding its implementation and with dissent among professionals regarding outcomes that are amorphously defined across age groups, systems and global settings, a group of children’s nursing experts from around the world collaborated to seek clarification of the terms, deconstruct the elements in the model and describe empirically a consensus of values toward operationally defining FCC. A modified Delphi method was used drawing on expert opinions of participants from eight countries to develop a contemporary and internationally agreed list of 27 statements (descriptors of FCC) that could form the foundation for a measure for future empirical psychometric study of FCC across settings and countries. Results indicated that even among FCC experts, understandings of FCC differ and that this may account for some of the confusion and conceptual disagreement. Recommendations were identified to underpin the development of a clearer vision of FCC.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pediatrics,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3