A burden of knowledge

Author:

Green Janet1,Darbyshire Philip2,Adams Anne,Jackson Debra1

Affiliation:

1. University of Technology, Sydney, Australia

2. Monash University; Flinders University, Australia

Abstract

Improved life-sustaining technology in the neonatal intensive care has resulted in an increased probability of survival for extremely premature babies. In the neonatal intensive care, the condition of a baby can deteriorate rapidly. Nurses and parents are together for long periods at the bedside and so form close and trusting relationships. Neonatal nurses as the constant caregivers may be presented with contradictory demands in attempting to meet the baby’s needs and being a patient and family advocate. This article aims to explore the issues arising for neonatal nurses when holding information about changes to a condition of a baby that they are unable to share with parents. Data were collected via interviews with 24 neonatal nurses in New South Wales, Australia. A qualitative approach was used to analyse the data. The theme ‘keeping secrets’ was identified and comprised of three sub-themes ‘coping with potentially catastrophic news’, ‘fear of inadvertent disclosure’ and ‘a burden that could damage trust’. Keeping secrets and withholding information creates internal conflict in the nurses as they balance the principle of confidentiality with the parent’s right to know information. The neonatal nurses experienced guilt and shame when they were felt forced by circumstances to keep secrets or withhold information from the parents of extremely premature babies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pediatrics,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The relationship between power and secrecy;Journal of Experimental Social Psychology;2022-05

2. Impact of Dying Neonates on Doctors' and Nurses' Personhood: A Systematic Scoping Review;Journal of Pain and Symptom Management;2022-01

3. Secondary Traumatic Stress and Vigor Among Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Personnel;Advances in Neonatal Care;2021-08-19

4. Professional ethics: the case of neonatology;Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy;2018-09-07

5. Navigating the Dangerous Terrain of Moral Distress: Understanding Response Patterns in the NICU;Qualitative Health Research;2018-01-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3