Investigating paradoxes in the music teaching profession

Author:

Girdzijauskienė Rūta1,Economidou Stavrou Natassa2ORCID,Schaumberger Helmut3ORCID,Frischknecht Ruth4

Affiliation:

1. Lithuanian Academy of Music and Theatre, Lithuania

2. University of Nicosia, Cyprus

3. Gustav Mahler Private University of Music, Austria

4. Zurich University of the Arts, Switzerland

Abstract

Teachers are regularly confronted with paradoxes in their profession: clashes between different sets of values, their roles and their personal authenticity, the desire to be open but also detached, and the willingness to encourage students to have their own opinion but at the same time to obey and adapt. In this article, we investigate paradoxes in the music teaching profession with the aim of identifying those that are inherent to the field of music education and do not depend on a specific place or cultural context. To comprehend these paradoxes, we conducted a narrative study focused on the experiences of music teachers as presented through their own stories. This narrative study of 12 music teachers who worked with 10- to 15-year-old students in comprehensive schools was carried out in four European countries. The study applied a three-stage narrative interview strategy that asked teachers to share cases from their experience that implied paradoxes in their professional work. Based on this study, three umbrella categories of paradoxes were identified: paradoxes on curriculum negotiation and co-negotiation with students, free action in a regulated environment, and the double identity of music teachers. The study results offered insights applicable to music teacher education which can be summarized as a proposal to expose prospective music teachers to the paradoxes in their future profession and to discuss strategies that might help them manage these paradoxes.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Music,Education

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Editorial;Research Studies in Music Education;2024-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3