“I Know Myself Again, Which Makes Me Motivated for Life”: Feasibility and Acceptability of Using Experience Sampling Methods With Trauma-Exposed Sexual Minority Women

Author:

Scheer Jillian R.1ORCID,Cascalheira Cory J.12,Helminen Emily C.13ORCID,Shaw Thomas J.4,Schwarz Aubriana A.1,Jaipuriar Virinca1ORCID,Brisbin Cal D.5,Batchelder Abigail W.678,Sullivan Tami P.9ORCID,Jackson Skyler D.10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, Syracuse University, NY, USA

2. New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM,USA

3. Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, USA

4. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA

5. Luskin School of Public Affairs, The University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

6. Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

7. Behavioral Medicine Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

8. The Fenway Institute, Fenway Health, Boston, MA, USA

9. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

10. Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA

Abstract

Intensive longitudinal designs (e.g., experience sampling methods [ESMs]) hold promise for examining the dynamic interplay between daily adversity, coping strategies, and behavioral and mental health issues among marginalized populations. However, few studies have used intensive longitudinal designs with sexual minority women (SMW), an understudied and at-risk population. We assessed feasibility and acceptability of using once-daily, interval-contingent ESM with 161 trauma-exposed SMW ( Mage = 29.1, SD = 7.57); 20.5% nonbinary; 32.3% queer; 52.2% people of color; 14.3% with annual incomes ≤$9,999; and 30.4% in Southern United States (U.S.). SMW completed one comprehensive online baseline assessment and once-daily brief online assessments for 14 days. Daily surveys assessed past-24-hour stressors, stress responses, and behavioral and mental health symptoms. At the end of the 14-day ESM period, SMW answered three open-ended questions about participating in this study and about research with SMW. Regarding feasibility, 151 participants (94.0%) initiated the post-baseline ESM study portion and 72 (45.0%) completed all 14 daily surveys. An average of 11.70 (median = 13, SD = 3.31) daily surveys (83.5%) were completed by those who initiated the ESM. ESM completion level varied by race/ethnicity and U.S. region. Qualitative acceptability data revealed several themes, namely that SMW (1) enjoyed participating and felt positively about the ESM experience, (2) felt supported to reflect on impacts of early and ongoing stressors, (3) appreciated the chance to self-reflect and challenge existing thought patterns and coping behaviors, (4) recognized their capacity to tolerate trauma-related distress, (5) recommended that researchers focus on SMW’s diverse stressors and daily experiences, (6) wanted a rationale for providing sensitive information and more space to narrate their experiences, and (7) recognized the need for affirmative treatment and policies. Findings could inform modifications to ESM protocols to improve their feasibility and acceptability among trauma-exposed SMW and promote ongoing utility of this valuable method.

Funder

yale university

National Institute of Mental Health

National Institute on Drug Abuse

Yale University Women’s Faculty Forum Seed Grant

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3