Reproductive Autonomy in Appalachia: An Investigation into Perceived Contraceptive Pressure

Author:

Huslage Melody1ORCID,Ely Gretchen E.1,Nugent William R.1,Auerbach Samantha2,Agbemenu Kafuli2

Affiliation:

1. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, College of Social Work, Knoxville, TN, USA

2. University at Buffalo, School of Nursing, Buffalo, NY, USA

Abstract

The reproductive autonomy of persons who can give birth can be impeded through forms of interpersonal violence and coercion. Moreover, macro-level factors (e.g., poverty, discrimination, community violence, legislative policies) may impede the reproductive autonomy of entire communities. This study investigates a form of violence we term perceived contraceptive pressure in Appalachia, an understudied region of the Eastern U.S., regarding reproductive health and decision-making. Through targeted Meta advertising, participants ( N = 632) residing in Appalachian zip codes completed an online survey on reproductive health. The focus of this study was to investigate the prevalence of perceived contraceptive pressure, who was at increased risk of experiencing pressure, and the source(s) of perceived pressure. Binomial regressions were conducted on three different dependent variables: perceived pressure to be sterilized, perceived pressure to use birth control, and perceived pressure not to use birth control. Approximately half of all respondents (49.5%) reported experiencing at least one type of pressure targeting contraceptive decision-making. The most prevalent source of perceived pressure to use birth control was from the healthcare provider (67.4%), and the most prevalent source of perceived pressure not to use birth control was the respondent’s partner (51.1%). Recommendations for providers serving clients in the Appalachian region include pursuing education regarding contraceptive pressure at the individual level and macro-level. In addition, Appalachian residents may benefit from educational programming on reproductive autonomy, healthy relationships, and how to navigate pressure in relationships.

Funder

Society of Family Planning

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Psychology,Clinical Psychology

Reference66 articles.

1. Committee Opinion No. 695: Sterilization of Women: Ethical Issues and Considerations

2. Appalachian Regional Commission (ARC). (n.d.). About the Appalachian region. Author. https://www.arc.gov/about-the-appalachian-region/

3. Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice. (2005). A new vision for advancing our movement for reproductive health, reproductive rights and reproductive justice. Author. https://forwardtogether.org/tools/

4. Women’s Reproductive Coercion and Pregnancy Avoidance: Associations With Homicide Risk, Sexual Violence, and Religious Abuse

5. Pediatricians' Attitudes and Beliefs about Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptives Influence Counseling

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3