Rating scales to measure side effects of antipsychotic medication: A systematic review

Author:

van Strien Astrid M1,Keijsers Carolina JPW1,Derijks Hieronymus J2,van Marum Rob J13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geriatric Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ’s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands

2. Hospital Pharmacy ZANOB, ’s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands

3. Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

Introduction: Many patients experience side effects during treatment with antipsychotics. This article reviews the clinical use and psychometric characteristics of rating scales used to assess side effects in patients treated with antipsychotics. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the electronic databases PubMed and Embase, with predefined search terms. Results: In total, 52 different scales were used in the 440 articles retrieved. For multiple side effects measured with one scale, the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser Side Effects Rating Scale for Clinicians was used the most, whereas the Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side Effect Rating Scale had the best psychometric characteristics (Cronbach’s α 0.81 and test–retest reliability 0.89). The Simpson Angus Scale was used the most to rate extrapyramidal side effects, although the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center scale had the best characteristics (Cronbach’s α 0.80, test–retest reliability 0.92 and inter-rater reliability 0.81–0.90). The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale was used the most to assess sexual dysfunction, but the Antipsychotics and Sexual Functioning Questionnaire and the Nagoya Sexual Functioning Questionnaire had the best characteristics. Conclusion: This review will help researchers and clinicians make a purpose-oriented choice of which scale to use. Systematic review registration number: CRD42014013010.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3