Similar effects of buspirone and chlordiazepoxide on a fixed interval schedule with long-term, low-dose administration

Abstract

Buspirone is a novel anxiolytic which does not share the muscle relaxant, anticonvulsant and sedative properties of classical anxiolytics such as the benzodiazepines. Its effects on behavioural tests of anxiolytic action generally match those of classical anxiolytics provided a low dose is used. However, in a previous experiment, buspirone appeared to affect fixed interval responding in a way which differed qualitatively as well as quantitatively from the classical anxiolytic chlordiazepoxide. It takes as much as 2 weeks for the clinical effects of anxiolytics to develop, during which time the side effects of benzodiazepines undergo tolerance. We, therefore, decided to compare long-term pre-administration (60 days, three injections/day) of buspirone and chlordiazepoxide on learning of a fixed interval 60-s schedule. The doses were based on previous acute dose-response tests of hippocampal theta rhythm in freely moving animals. Buspirone (0.1 mg/ kg i.p.) and chlordiazepoxide (0.4 mg/kg i.p.) produced similar increases in responding, especially in the middle of acquisition of the fixed interval schedule. Consistent with our acute electrophysiological tests, the effects of 0.4 mg/kg chlordiazepoxide were somewhat larger than those of 0.1 mg/kg buspirone. These results suggest that the acute effects of buspirone, but probably not chlordiazepoxide, on fixed interval responding are contaminated by side effects which do not seriously affect the results with long-term administration. The effects of both novel and classical anxiolytics on control of hippocampal theta rhythm appear to predict the magnitude of their common anxiolytic effects and to be unrelated to their different side effects.