Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychiatry, Tanzawa Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
2. Department of Psychiatry, Seimo Hospital, Gunma, Japan
3. Shakomae Kokorono Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
Abstract
Second-generation antipsychotics, which have become the standard drug therapies for schizophrenia, are known to have a serotonin 5-HT2A receptor blocking effect in addition to a dopamine D2 receptor blocking effect. However, although chlorpromazine (CPZ) has a 5-HT2A receptor blocking effect and has the profile of a second-generation antipsychotic in vitro, it loses this pharmacological profile in vivo. In order to elucidate the differences between the in vivo and in vitro pharmacological characteristics of CPZ, we used a radioreceptor assay to measure the anti-D2 activity and the anti-5-HT2A activity of CPZ and five major metabolites of CPZ, and compared the results to the anti-D2 activity and anti-5-HT2A activity of risperidone, zotepine, perospirone, the major metabolites of each of these drugs, and olanzapine, bromperidol, and haloperidol. The subjects were 182 patients who had received diagnoses of schizophrenia based on the DSM-IV criteria. The results revealed that CPZ exhibited little anti-5-HT2A activity, regardless of the anti-D2 activity level, and that none of the metabolites possessed anti-5-HT2A activity. However, both the parent compounds and the metabolites of each of the second-generation antipsychotics possessed both anti-D2 activity and anti-5-HT2A activity. This clarified that, unlike second-generation antipsychotics, the reason CPZ loses its second-generation antipsychotic profiles in vivo is because it does not have any metabolites that possess anti-5-HT2A activity.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献