Second generation antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

De Fruyt Jürgen12,Deschepper Ellen34,Audenaert Kurt4,Constant Eric5,Floris Michel6,Pitchot William7,Sienaert Pascal8,Souery Daniel910,Claes Stephan2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, General Hospital Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Brugge, Belgium

2. University Psychiatric Center – Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

3. Department of Applied Mathematics, Biometrics and Process Control, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium and Belgium Biostatistics Unit, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

4. Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

5. Department of Psychiatry, Université Catholique de Louvain, Woluwe-Saint-Lambert, Belgium

6. Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Tournai, Tournai, Belgium

7. Department of Psychiatry, University of Liège, CHU of Liège, Liège, Belgium

8. University Psychiatric Center – Catholic University Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium

9. Laboratory of Psychological Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium

10. Psy Pluriel – European Center of Psychological Medicine, Uccle, Belgium

Abstract

Depressive symptoms and episodes dominate the course of bipolar disorder. However, the therapeutic armamentarium for bipolar depression is limited. Recent evidence points to the efficacy of second generation antipsychotics (SGAs) for the treatment of bipolar depression. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of SGAs (randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials; used in monotherapy) in the treatment of adult patients with bipolar depression. Publication bias was corrected for by performing similar searches using the clinical trials register of the respective pharmaceutical companies, the Cochrane Database and ClinicalTrials.gov. Seven published papers were identified on the use of aripiprazole, olanzapine and quetiapine. Internal validity of the trials was fairly good, external validity only moderate. Different outcome measures of efficacy and safety were assessed. When the individual trials were looked at, quetiapine and to a lesser extent olanzapine demonstrated significant improvement in MADRS (Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale) total scores. This was not demonstrated for aripiprazole. Efficacy was hampered by adverse events, such as weight gain, akathisia and somnolence/sedation. Both clinical heterogeneity of the included trials and statistical heterogeneity of the meta-analytic data were considerable. The number of quetiapine trials was disproportionate to the number of trials of aripiprazole and olanzapine. Further research is needed to assess differential efficacy of the different SGAs and their use in clinical practice.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3