Clinical validation of the Aarhus Side effect Assessment Questionnaire(ASAQ)

Author:

Kølbæk Pernille123ORCID,Thorgaard Mette Viller23,Grooss Amalie Schnegelsberg3,Selvanathan Thusitha3,Larsen Sofie Fly3,Speed Maria23,Dines David1,Østergaard Søren Dinesen123

Affiliation:

1. Psychosis Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital—Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

3. Department of Affective Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital—Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark

Abstract

Background: Psychotropic medications are essential in the treatment of mental illness. Unfortunately, these medications are associated with side effects that may reduce adherence to treatment and quality of life. Therefore, systematic screening for side effects is fundamental to optimize treatment with psychotropic medications. Self-report of side effects is a practical alternative to time-consuming clinical assessments. We developed the Aarhus Side effect Assessment Questionnaire (ASAQ) in an attempt to strike the balance between extensive coverage of side effects and reasonable application time. Aim: The aim of the study was to validate the ASAQ using the clinician-rated Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) Side Effect Scale as gold standard reference. Methods: A total of 122 inpatients and outpatients—mainly with psychotic (39%) and affective disorders (43%)—receiving treatment with psychotropic medication completed the ASAQ and the World Health Organization–Five Well-Being Index (WHO-5) and were subsequently rated on the UKU by trained raters. Results: Using the UKU as the gold standard reference, the ASAQ demonstrated sensitivity values >75% for 77% of its 30 items (ranging from 37% for cutaneous disturbances to 98% for increased sweating) and specificity values >75% for 47% of its 30 items (ranging from 28% for reduced sleep to 98% for micturition disturbances). While 17% of the participants considered discontinuing their medication, 24% had recently refrained from taking their medication as prescribed. A negative correlation was found between the ASAQ and the WHO-5 and total scores (Pearson’s correlation coefficient = –0.44). Conclusions: The self-reported ASAQ seems to be a sensitive tool for detecting side effects of psychotropic medications.

Funder

Det Frie Forskningsråd

Novo Nordisk Fonden

Kræftens Bekæmpelse

Central Denmark Region Fund for Strengthening of Health Science

Lundbeckfonden

Danish Agency for Digitisation Investment Fund for New Technologies

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3