Affiliation:
1. Institute of Naval Medicine, Alverstoke, Gosport, Hants PO12 2DL, UK
Abstract
Investigations into antimotion sickness drugs fall into two main categories: efficacy ('benefits') and side-effects ('costs'). This study was of the second type. Oral cinnarizine (30 mg: normal dose; and 75 mg: 2.5 x normal dose) and placebo, were investigated using a battery of automated mental, motor, physiological and other tests in twelve young healthy male volunteers. The higher cinnarizine dose level was chosen to exaggerate effects and make it easier to track them. Oral hyoscine (1.2 mg: 2 x normal dose) was employed as a positive internal control. Side-effects were almost exclusively due to hyoscine whereas cinnarizine was almost free of significant effects even at the higher dose of 75 mg. Hyoscine impaired performance 1-3 hours postdrug, whereas the effects of cinnarizine occurred approximately 5-7 hours postdrug. This paralleled the slower time-course for the protective action of cinnarizine against motion sickness noted in earlier studies. These results, taken in conjunction with previous trials, suggest that oral cinnarizine would seem less likely than hyoscine to produce unwanted decrements in performance.
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献