Patient perspectives of lithium and quetiapine augmentation treatment in treatment-resistant depression: A qualitative assessment

Author:

McKeown Lucas1,Taylor Rachael W1ORCID,Day Elana1,Shah Rupal1ORCID,Marwood Lindsey1ORCID,Tee Helena1,Kerr-Gaffney Jess1ORCID,Oprea Emanuella1,Geddes John R23,McAllister-Williams R Hamish45,Young Allan H16,Cleare Anthony J16

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Affective Disorders, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK

2. Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

3. Warneford Hospital, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK

4. Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

5. Northern Centre for Mood Disorders, Newcastle University Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

6. South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Abstract

Background: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) has a profound cost to patients and healthcare services worldwide. Pharmacological augmentation is one therapeutic option for TRD, with lithium and quetiapine currently recommended as first-line agents. Patient opinions about pharmacological augmentation may affect treatment outcomes, yet these have not been systematically explored. Aims: This study aimed to qualitatively assess patient experiences of lithium and quetiapine augmentation. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 32 patients from the ongoing lithium versus quetiapine open-label trial comparing these augmentation agents in patients with TRD. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and a thematic analysis was used to assess patient opinions of each agent. Results: Four main themes were generated from the thematic analysis: ‘Initial concerns’, ‘Experience of side effects’, ‘Perception of treatment efficacy’ and ‘Positive perception of treatment monitoring’. Patient accounts indicated a predominantly positive experience of lithium and quetiapine augmentation. Greater apprehension about side effects was reported for lithium prior to treatment initiation, but greater experience of negative side effects was reported for quetiapine. Clinical monitoring was perceived positively. Conclusion: Patient accounts suggested treatment augmentation with lithium or quetiapine was acceptable and helpful for most patients. However, anticipation and experiences of adverse side effects may prevent some patients from benefitting from these treatments.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment Programme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Psychiatry and Mental health,Pharmacology

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Lithium: how low can you go?;International Journal of Bipolar Disorders;2024-01-30

2. Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions;World Psychiatry;2023-09-15

3. Lithium/quetiapine;Reactions Weekly;2022-07

4. The psychopharmacology of mood disorders;Journal of Psychopharmacology;2022-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3