Early Intervention Providers’ Perspectives About Implementing Participation-Based Practices

Author:

Fleming Jennifer L.1,Sawyer L. Brook2,Campbell Philippa H.2

Affiliation:

1. Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,

2. Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract

Early intervention providers submitted videotapes of home visits as part of requirements for a professional development course. Taped visits were classified into two practice groups: providers who demonstrated use of participation-based practices and those who did not (i.e., traditional practices). A sample of providers, selected from each of these groups, were interviewed to elicit perspectives about implementing participation-based practices. Findings indicate that providers, regardless of practice classification, did not fully understand participation-based practices. In particular, a provider role of promoting children’s participation in family/community activities and routines was not articulated. The caregiver’s role as facilitator of the child’s participation and learning was seldom described although the importance of involving, teaching, and supporting caregivers was acknowledged. Most providers described themselves as able to implement optimal services for only a small percentage of families and attributed both their ability and inability to family characteristics.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Reference37 articles.

1. Informational and dispositional determinants of children's achievement attributions.

2. Family Involvement in Assessment and Intervention: Perceptions of Professionals and Parents in Sweden

3. Bronfenbrenner, U. ( 1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187-248). Philadelphia, PA: Kingsley.

4. Participation-Based Services

Cited by 73 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3