Noncompliance Interventions for Young Children: A Best Evidence Synthesis and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Malone Elisabeth J.1ORCID,Zimmerman Kathleen N.1ORCID,Joo Sean1,Kim Gospel Y.2ORCID,Smith Kelsey H.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Kansas, Lawrence, USA

2. University of California Davis MIND Institute, Sacramento, USA

Abstract

A best-evidence synthesis and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate interventions designed to decrease noncompliance in early childhood settings. Studies were examined for quality, intervention components, and outcomes for young children (ages 2–8 years) across settings. Results indicated most designs were high-quality and produced desired outcomes. However, participant inclusion criteria were commonly underreported, and social and ecological validity data were absent. Thus, for whom noncompliance interventions are effective, appropriate, feasible, or preferred is largely unknown. Contrary to prior evidence from the broader challenging behavior literature, function-based assessments had no impact on intervention outcomes. Reasons for this finding are explored, including the narrow application of function-based assessment findings to compliance interventions. Future implications for research and practice are presented.

Funder

National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Education

Reference53 articles.

1. Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-8. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4

2. Behavior Analyst Certification Board. (2020). Ethics code for behavior analysts. http://bacb.com/wp-content/ethics-code-for-behavior-analysts/

3. Behavior Problems in Learning Activities and Social Interactions in Head Start Classrooms and Early Reading, Mathematics, and Approaches to Learning

4. Constant Time Delay and System of Least Prompts: Efficiency and Child Preference

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3