Acceptability of the Long-Term In-Home Ventilator Engagement virtual intervention for home mechanical ventilation patients during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative evaluation

Author:

Dale Craig M.12ORCID,Ambreen Munazzah3,Kang Sohee14,Buchanan Francine3,Pizzuti Regina5,Gershon Andrea S.678,Rose Louise910,Amin Reshma81112ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

2. Tory Trauma Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

3. Medical Surgical Intensive Care Unit, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

4. Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada

5. Live Program, Ontario Ventilator Equipment Pool, Kingston, ON, Canada

6. Division of Respirology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

7. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada

8. Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

9. Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Kings College London, London, UK

10. Department of Critical Care and Lane Fox Unit, Guy's & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

11. Division of Respiratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada

12. Clinical Health Evaluative Sciences, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background Clinical management of ventilator-assisted individuals (VAIs) was challenged by social distancing rules during the COVID-19 pandemic. In May 2020, the Long-Term In-Home Ventilator Engagement (LIVE) Program was launched in Ontario, Canada to provide intensive digital care case management to VAIs. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the acceptability of the LIVE Program hosted via a digital platform during the COVID-19 pandemic from diverse perspectives. Methods We conducted a qualitative descriptive study (May 2020–April 2021) comprising semi-structured interviews with participants from eight home ventilation specialty centers in Ontario, Canada. We purposively recruited patients, family caregivers, and providers enrolled in LIVE. Content analysis and the theoretical concepts of acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness were used to interpret findings. Results A total of 40 individuals (2 VAIs, 18 family caregivers, 20 healthcare providers) participated. Participants described LIVE as acceptable as it addressed a longstanding imperative to improve care access, ease of use, and training provided; feasible for triaging problems and sharing information; and appropriate for timeliness of provider responses, workflows, and perceived value. Negative perceptions of acceptability among healthcare providers concerned digital workload and fit with existing clinical workflows. Perceived benefits accorded to LIVE included enhanced physical and psychological safety in the home, patient–provider relations, and VAI engagement in their own care. Conclusions Study findings identify factors influencing the LIVE Program's acceptability by patients, family caregivers, and healthcare providers during pandemic conditions including enhanced access to care, ease of case management triage, and VAI safety. Findings may inform the implementation of digital health services to VAIs in non-pandemic circumstances.

Funder

Ontario Ventilator Equipment Pool

Ontario Ministry of Health Assistive Devices Program

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics,Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3