Affiliation:
1. Department of Sociology, Political Science and Administration, and Philosophy, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
2. Department of Political Science and Sociology, Faculty of Political Science and Administration, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Abstract
Background In recent years, the healthcare sector has experienced accelerated progress in terms of the inclusion of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in its procedures and formalities. However, public administrations have been unable to adapt to the peculiarities of the most vulnerable groups. This leads to marginalization of at-risk groups within the healthcare system and contributes to the widening of the so-called digital divide. Methods Based on the analysis of the literature, three dimensions have been constructed to identify the level of inclusion of web portals: the perception of quality, the perception of usability, and the importance attributed to their content. In order to obtain data on each of these dimensions, a study was designed based on the user test methodology as a central element (identifying and evaluating 11 vulnerable groups) and, in parallel, a survey of the general population and heuristic tests. Results A high percentage of vulnerable people at risk of social exclusion are not receiving adequate healthcare due to the digitalization of the system and the implementation of scarcely inclusive health web portals, which pose significant barriers in service provision for the 11 selected collectives. Meanwhile, the general population is being introduced to eHealth benefits, although the latter did not have high levels of digitization or a broad portfolio of services. Conclusions The general population has a relatively positive perspective of eHealth services, but only a minority of them make intensive use of them, and they are not widespread in Spain as a whole. Meanwhile, the population at risk of exclusion lacks the skills and resources to make real use of eHealth, needing “digital intermediaries” from the social sphere to achieve results. eHealth policies are not taking into account people with higher levels of marginalization, aggravating their exclusion and the digital divide.
Funder
Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Subject
Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics,Health Policy
Reference93 articles.
1. JASEHN. Report on EU state of play on telemedicine services and uptake recommendations, https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/ehealth/docs/ev_20171128_co09_en.pdf (2017).
2. World Health Organization. mHealth: New horizons for health through mobile technologies. https://www.who.int/goe/publications/goe_mhealth_web.pdf (2011).
3. World Health Organization (WHO Global Observatory for eHealth). Telemedicine—Opportunities and developments in Member States, http://www.who.int/goe/publications/ehealth_series_vol2/en (2011).
4. La eSalud en España: evolución, estado actual y perspectivas de futuro
5. Empirica D. eHealth in Action Good Practice in European Countries Good eHealth Report [Internet]. Brussels; 2009. Report No.: 9789279111389.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献