The quality of digital health software: Should we be concerned?

Author:

Kokol Peter12ORCID,Vošner Helena Blažun345,Kokol Marko16ORCID,Završnik Jernej34

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

3. Community Healthcare Center Dr Adolf Drolc Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

4. Alma Mater Europaea, Maribor, Slovenia

5. Faculty of Health and Social Sciences Slovenj Gradec, Slovenj Gradec, Slovenia

6. Semantika Research, Semantika d.o.o., Maribor, Slovenia

Abstract

The digitalization of healthcare fuelled by advances in technology and the increased prevalence of mobile smart devices and health-related internet of things can offer equitable access to expert-level healthcare globally. Growing demand for telemedicine, mobile health apps, and advanced data analytics have further established their role in a modern information society during the Covid-19 crisis. Digital health is, in essence, powered by software (DHSW), which has to operate in the specific digital health environment characteristics and is therefore highly and intrinsically complex and prone to software defects and faults. Given the lack of standardization regarding DHSW quality, we explored the available reviewed research on this crucial topic in this brief paper, using a synthetic thematic analysis approach. We assert that neither the volume, distribution nor scope of the DHSW quality research content is satisfactory, and significant research gaps exist. Based on the presented evidence, we can only conclude that we should be concerned and that the time to act is now to ensure that the unavoidable increase of usage and prevalence of DHSW will not – in the end – reduce the quality of care due to subpar software and software-based digital health systems.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Information Management,Computer Science Applications,Health Informatics,Health Policy

Reference20 articles.

1. Health data poverty: an assailable barrier to equitable digital health care

2. WHO Global Strategy on Digital Health 2020–2025. The Compass for SBC, 2019. https://www.thecompassforsbc.org/sbcc-tools/who-global-strategy-digital-health-2020-2025 (accessed 16 November 2021).

3. The need for feminist intersectionality in digital health

4. Beyond validation: getting health apps into clinical practice

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3