Psychotherapists’ views on open notes: An online survey from Germany

Author:

Schwarz Julian123ORCID,Neumann Katharina24,Meier-Diedrich Eva12,Mühlensiepen Felix23ORCID,Hochwarter Stefan5,Blease Charlotte67

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Center for Mental Health, Immanuel Hospital Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany

2. Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany

3. Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Rüdersdorf, Germany

4. Department for Addictive Disorders, Salus Hospital Lindow, Lindow, Germany

5. HEALTH – Institute for Biomedical Research and Technologies, Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH, Graz, Austria

6. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

7. Division of General Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA

Abstract

Background In an increasing number of countries, patients are given online record access (ORA) to their clinical notes (“open notes”). In many places, psychotherapy notes are exempt, even if patients explicitly wish to read them. Previous research suggests that psychotherapists (PTs) have reservations that are not yet fully understood. Objective To investigate the attitudes and perceived effects of open notes on psychotherapeutic care, patients, and individual psychotherapeutic practice in Germany. Methods Psychological and medical therapists were invited to participate in a national online survey. Sociodemographic characteristics such as gender, age, professional group, and psychotherapeutic school were gathered. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the 51-item survey. Results 129 PTs completed the survey. Only a small proportion of respondents (30 out of 129, 23.3%) suspected that open notes would improve the efficiency of psychotherapeutic care. On the one hand, participants assumed that patients gain more control over their treatment (59 out of 129, 45.7%) and are better able to remember therapy goals (55 out of 129, 42.6%), although this was considered unlikely to lead to greater engagement in the therapy process (94 out of 129, 72.9%). On the other hand, PTs expected patients to misunderstand their notes, feel offended (98 out of 129, 76.0%), and approach them with questions (107 out of 129, 82.9%) or requests for changes (94 out of 129, 72.9%). The respondents also anticipated being less honest when writing (95 out of 129, 73.6%) and reported they needed more time for documentation (99 out of 129, 76.7%). A meaningful use of open notes for working with relatives was envisaged (101 out of 129, 78.3%). Conclusion PTs in Germany tend to have a negative attitude towards patients’ ORA on open notes. Further research on clinical efficacy and feasibility is necessary to demonstrate whether open notes add value in the context of psychotherapy.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ministry of Science, Research and Cultural Affairs of the State of Brandenburg

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3