Patients’ acceptability of self-selected digital health services to support diet and exercise among people with complex chronic conditions: Mixed methods study

Author:

Barnett Amandine12ORCID,Catapan Soraia de Camargo12ORCID,Jegatheesan Dev K34,Conley Marguerite M5,Keating Shelley E67,Mayr Hannah L358,Webb Lindsey5,Brown Riley C C67,Coombes Jeff S67,Macdonald Graeme A3910,Isbel Nicole M34,Burton Nicola W111213,Campbell Katrina L31314,Hickman Ingrid J3515,Kelly Jaimon T12

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

2. Centre for Health Services Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3. Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

4. Department of Nephrology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

5. Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

6. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

7. Centre for Research on Exercise, Physical Activity & Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

8. Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

9. Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

10. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

11. School of Applied Psychology, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

12. Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University Mount Gravatt, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

13. Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia

14. Healthcare Excellence and Innovation, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane QLD, Australia

15. ULTRA Team, The University of Queensland Clinical Trials Capability, Herston, Brisbane, Australia

Abstract

Objective The acceptability of being offered a choice from a suite of digital health service options to support optimal diet and exercise behaviors in adults with complex chronic conditions was evaluated. This study sought to understand many areas of acceptability including satisfaction, ease of use, usefulness and user appropriateness and perceived effectiveness. Methods This mixed-methods study was embedded within a randomized-controlled feasibility trial providing digital health services managing diet and exercise for adults from specialist kidney and liver disease clinics. Post study surveys and semistructured interviews were used to determine patients’ acceptability of the trial interventions. Quantitative (surveys) and qualitative (surveys and interviews) results were merged using integrative analysis and mapped to each construct of the modified version of the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability. Results Seventeen interviews (intervention group) and 50 surveys ( n = 24 intervention, n = 26 comparator) completed from a possible 67 participants were analyzed. In the intervention group, the survey results revealed high areas of acceptability for the digital health services including overall support received, ease of use, timely advice and feeling safe. The interviews also revealed high areas of acceptability including convenience, ability to adopt healthier behaviors and having regular interactions with health professionals. However, the interviews also revealed lower areas of acceptability as a result of absence of individualization, low digital literacy, and limitations from life circumstances. Conclusions Recipients of digital health services that supported diet and exercise interventions found these useful, effective, and safe. Individualized care, technical support and patient confidence remain important to improve the acceptability of digital health service interventions.

Funder

Metro South Health Research Support Scheme

Queensland Health, Health Practitioners Research Scheme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference56 articles.

1. World Health Organization. World health statistics 2022. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/356584/9789240051140-eng.pdf?sequence=1. (2022, accessed 2 September 2022)

2. World Health Organization. WHO reveals leading causes of death and disability worldwide: 2000-2019, https://www.who.int/news/item/09-12-2020-who-reveals-leading-causes-of-death-and-disability-worldwide-2000-2019 (2020, accessed 15 February 2023).

3. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Liver transplantation

4. Guidelines for the management of chronic kidney disease

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3