Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of digital health readiness questionnaire among hypertension patients in rural areas of China

Author:

Xu Linqi123,Yu Tianzhuo1,Leng Xin1,Yu Tianyue1,Scherrenberg Martijn234,Falter Maarten235,Kaihara Toshiki6,Kizilkilic Sevda Ece23,Van Erum Hanne3,Kindermans Hanne3,Dendale Paul23,Tong Qian7,Li Feng1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, Jilin University, Changchun, China

2. Heart Centre Hasselt, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium

3. Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, UHasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium

4. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium

5. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium

6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan

7. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China

Abstract

Introduction Digital health has the potential to support health care in rural areas by overcoming the problems of distance and poor infrastructure, however, rural areas have extremely low use of digital health because of the lack of interaction with technology. There is no existing tool to measure digital health literacy in rural China. This study aims to test and validate the digital health readiness questionnaire for assessing digital readiness among patients in rural China. Methods Due to the different Internet environments in China compared to Belgium, a cultural adaptation is needed to optimize the use of Digital Health Readiness Questionnaire in China. Then, a prospective single-center survey study was conducted in rural China among patients with hypertension. Confirmatory factor analysis was computed to test the measurement models. Results A total of 330 full questionnaires were selected and included in the analysis. The model-fit measures were used to assess the model's overall goodness of fit (Chi-square/degrees of freedom = 5.060, comparative fit index = 0.889, Tucker–Lewis index (TLI) = 0.869, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.111, standardized root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.0880). TLI is a little bit lower than the borderline (more than 0.9) and RMSEA is higher than it (less than 0.08 means good model fit). We deleted two items 2 and 4 and the result shows a better goodness of fit (Chi-square/degrees of freedom = 4.897, comparative fit index = 0.914, TLI = 0.895, RMSEA = 0.109, SRMR = 0.0765) Conclusion To increase applicability and generalizability in rural areas, it should be considered to use the calculation of only the parts Digital skills, Digital literacy and Digital health literacy which are equally applicable in a Belgian population as in a rural Chinese population.

Funder

Remote Management of Cardiovascular and Peripheral Vascular Diseases Technology and Intelligent System Development

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3