Does the level of descriptive representation of women have any consequences for policy spending?

Author:

Högström John1ORCID,Lidén Gustav1

Affiliation:

1. Mid Sweden University, Sweden

Abstract

This study examines the potential link between descriptive and substantive representation. More precisely, we examine whether a higher level of political descriptive representation of women improves their substantive representation in terms of policy spending in areas that are known to be prioritized by women. We use data from a pooled sample of all of the 290 Swedish municipalities covering the years from 1994 to 2021. We make at least four contributions to the research field: we use multiple measures of (1) women’s political representation and (2) policy spending, and we also (3) test assumptions at the subnational level, where policy spending matters most, and (4) assess them over a longer period of time, stretching across almost three decades. In contrast to our expectations, the findings show that the descriptive representation of women has no influence on policy spending; instead, economic and demographical aspects dominate.

Funder

Riksbankens Jubileumsfond

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference87 articles.

1. The Legitimacy of Representation: How Descriptive, Formal, and Responsiveness Representation Affect the Acceptability of Political Decisions

2. The gender recontest gap in elections

3. Baskaran T, Hessami Z (2023) Women in political bodies as policymakers. SSRN Scholarly Paper 4377785. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4377785

4. Baskaran T, Hessami Z, Schirner S (2022) Young vs. old politicians and public spending priorities. Available at: http://congress-files.s3.amazonaws.com/2022-07/Baskaran_Hessami_Schirner_Young_Politicians_EEA_2022.pdf

5. Beaman L, Duflo E, Pande R, et al (2007) Women politicians, gender bias, and policy-making in rural India. UNICEF. Available at: https://assets.website-files.com/5c363d1243fb7b35a3f0069d/5c3cc8382af6c86592d54e07_pub-b-5.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3