Affiliation:
1. Research Data Center at the Federal Institute of Vocational Education and Training (BIBB-FDZ), Germany,
Abstract
There are several explanations for the inequality upswing in the literature: rising globalization, the institutional re-structuring of the nation-states, as well as changes in the relation between the demand for and the supply of skills. Concerning demand changes, Kuznets and Lewis identified two inequality affecting mechanisms with regard to the agriculture-to-industry transition: sector bias — that is, inequality within sectors — and sector dualism — that is, inequality between sectors. In this article it is analyzed whether there are analogue effects on inequality from the sectoral change to the knowledge society. Following the strategy of a most-similar design and a variable oriented approach the hypotheses are tested cross-nationally and longitudinally in 19 OECD countries between 1970 and 1999. To verify sectoral effects, error component models are computed regressing the Gini-coefficient on a globalization measure, the union density, the educational attainment as well as the employment and income differential in the knowledge sector. The results show that some amount of the inequality upswing in the last few decades can be explained by the sectoral change to the knowledge society.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference95 articles.
1. Technical Change, Inequality, and the Labor Market
2. Inequality and Economic Growth: The Perspective of the New Growth Theories
3. Globalization and the Great U-Turn: Income Inequality Trends in 16 OECD Countries
4. Atkinson, A.B. ( 2003) ‘Ungleichheit, Armut und der Wohlfahrtsstaat: Eine europäische Perspektive zur Globalisierungsdiskussion’, in W. Müller and S. Scherer (eds) Mehr Risiken - mehr Ungleichheit? pp. 63-82. Frankfurt/Main : Campus-Verlag.
5. The distribution of earnings in OECD countries
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献