Satisfaction and effectiveness of switching from intravenous to subcutaneous belimumab treatment in daily clinical practice

Author:

Frade-Sosa Beatriz1ORCID,Salman-Monte Tarek Carlos2ORCID,Narváez Javier3,Peralta Irene4,Sandoval Sebastian5,Magallares Berta6,Heredia Sergi7,Sapena Nuria1,Riveros-Frutos Anne4,Olivé Alejandro4,Corominas Hector6,Cortés-Hernández Josefina5,Gómez-Puerta José A18ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain

2. Rheumatology Department, Hospital Del Mar/Parc de Salut Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain

3. Rheumatology Department, Hospital de Bellvitge, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

4. Rheumatology Department, Hospital Universitario Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain

5. Rheumatology Department, Hospital Vall D'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

6. Rheumatology Department, Hospital Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

7. Rheumatology Department, Hospital Moisès Broggi, Barcelona, Spain

8. Faculty of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Background In 2017, belimumab (BEL) was approved in subcutaneous (SQ) administration. The effectiveness after switching from intravenous (IV) to SQ and patient satisfaction in daily clinical practice has not been studied. During the pandemic, patient follow-up and treatment were significantly affected, and some patients need a change from IV to SQ. Our aim was to evaluate daily clinical practice satisfaction to SQ BEL therapy in patients previously treated IV BEL. We hypothesized that SQ BEL in SLE patients previously treated with IV BEL was similar in effectiveness and conferred higher satisfaction. Methods Observational, multicenter study, conducted in 7 reference centers in Catalonia. We included stable SLE patients (EULAR/ACR 2019) on treatment with SQ BEL and previous use of IV BEL (at least 3 months on IV BEL before switching). Since there are no well-validated tools for SQ BEL treatment satisfaction, we used RASQ-SQ, validated in patients with lymphoma who switched from IV Rituximab to SQ treatment, and modified for BEL treatment. Results Twenty-seven patients were included. The more prevalent clinical manifestations observed were related to the skin and joints and the patients had a mean baseline SLEDAI of 2.96 (SD 2.4) and SLICC score of 0.67 (SD 0.88). The median time from treatment with IV BEL before switching to SQ was 21 months (range). 84% of patients reported confidence in SQ BEL. 85.2% felt that treatment with SQ BEL was convenient or very convenient. 85% felt they had gained time with the change. 89% would recommend the SQ injection to other patients. Disease activity (mean SLEDAI) and remission rates remain stable after switching. No major new adverse effects were reported. Conclusions Overall satisfaction, satisfaction with via of administration, and satisfaction with the time taken to receive BEL were higher for SQ BEL treatment. A switching SQ strategy is a reasonable alternative for BEL patients.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3