Concentration of antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract

A hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is the production of autoantibodies directed against intracellular antigens. Antibodies to double stranded DNA (dsDNA) are most closely associated with the clinical manifestations of the condition and appear to have a direct role in pathogenesis. On the contrary, the relationship between disease activity in SLE and anti-extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) antibodies has not been well demonstrated. Despite this, commercial assays for the quantification of anti-ENA antibodies are now widely available, although their usefulness in clinical practice is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is an association between disease activity in SLE and concentrations of individual anti-ENA antibodies. A prospective 2-year study of 45 patients with SLE, known to be positive for at least one anti-ENA antibody, was performed. Disease activity was assessed using the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI). Anti-ENA antibodies were quantified using a commercial antibody detection system. A total of 45 patients were studied over a 2-year period (median number of assessments 5, range 2–9). Of them 29 patients were positive for Ro, 8 for La, 9 for Sm and 27 for RNP antibodies. In the population as a whole, there was a weak relationship between peak SLEDAI score and anti-Sm concentration ( r = 0.57, NS), but no relation with the other anti-ENA antibodies. In a small number of patients, there appeared to be either a positive (Ro, Sm) or negative (La, Sm, RNP) association between ENA antibody concentration and disease activity over time; however, this was not apparent for the majority of individuals. These results show that in SLE, clinically significant changes in disease activity do not correlate well with concentrations of anti-ENA antibodies, either within the population as a whole or on an individual basis. Repeated quantitative measurement of anti-ENA antibodies does not therefore appear to provide useful additional information in assessing disease activity in SLE. The widespread application of commercial quantitative assays to routine clinical practice is not recommended.