Affiliation:
1. Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway, and International Peace Research Institute, Oslo
Abstract
Cross-national comparisons of industrialized countries indicate that countries with a high defense burden (military spending as a share of GDP) tend to have lower rates of economic growth than do countries with a low defense burden. On the other hand, longitudinal data for several industrial countries indicate that economic growth is higher in periods with a high defense burden. This study attempts to overcome this apparent contradiction by pooling cross-sectional and longitudinal data within the framework of a model of economic growth. The data are for 17 OECD countries for the period 1960-1980. A simple mathematical model based on economic theory is used to analyze the interrelationships between economic growth, manufacturing output, investment, and military spending, both for the whole sample and for three relatively homogeneous subgroups of countries. Confronting the model with data, military spending was generally found to have a positive impact on manufacturing output, but a negative effect on investment. These two effects have an opposite impact on economic growth. The net effect is that military spending has an overall negative effect on economic growth for the whole sample of countries and for the subgroups, except for the Mediterranean countries.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Safety Research,Sociology and Political Science
Reference26 articles.
1. Ball, Nicole 1983. 'Defense and Development. A Critique of the Benoit Study' , pp. 39-56 in Helena Tuomi & Raimo Väyrynen, eds. Militarization and Arms Production London and Canberra : Croom Helm.
Cited by
118 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献