‘One always looks for a compromise…’: Senior prison managers’ views of law, human rights and prisoner complaints in Germany

Author:

Morgenstern Christine1,Rogan Mary2

Affiliation:

1. Fachbereich Rechtswissenschaft, Freie Universitat Berlin, Berlin, Germany

2. School of Law, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract

German prison legislation is based on a fundamental rights approach but there has been little examination of how those who should be instantiating a culture of rights in penal regimes – prison staff – view such laws and rights. This question is of cross-national importance. Holding considerable power over people in custody, examining the ways in which prison staff see and act on obligations to protect these individuals provides useful insights into how a culture of human rights in detention exists, or otherwise. In this article, we seek to contribute to the literature on human rights in the context of punishment by examining how senior staff in German prisons view legal regulation, prisoners’ rights, and the mechanism designed to protect them: complaints. Drawing on 24 interviews conducted in four prisons across two Federal States, we find that the principle of resocialisation, considered to be a core feature of German prison law, is influential on prison managers. German prison legislation links this principle to prisoners’ rights, including the right to complain. Managers valued the law as a form of guidance though were more positive about legal regulation when it was used by them rather than against them or the prison system. Some saw legal precepts as useful ways of defending themselves against threats of litigation or blame. While the study finds that law is highly present in prison manager culture in Germany, the principle of resocialisation in prison management practice may have created a view of prisoners as people to be in need, rather than worthy of rights.

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Engineering,General Environmental Science

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3