Theoretical and Experimental Relationships between Percent Inhibition and IC50 Data Observed in High-Throughput Screening

Author:

Gubler Hanspeter1,Schopfer Ulrich2,Jacoby Edgar2

Affiliation:

1. Informatics and Technology, Novartis Pharma AG, Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland

2. Center for Proteomic Chemistry, Novartis Pharma AG, Institutes for BioMedical Research, Basel, Switzerland

Abstract

The four-parameter logistic Hill equation models the theoretical relationship between inhibitor concentration and response and is used to derive IC50 values as a measure of compound potency. This relationship is the basis for screening strategies that first measure percent inhibition at a single, uniform concentration and then determine IC50 values for compounds above a threshold. In screening practice, however, a “good” correlation between percent inhibition values and IC50 values is not always observed, and in the literature, there seems confusion about what correlation even to expect. We examined the relationship between percent inhibition data and IC50 data in HDAC4 and ENPP2 high-throughput screening (HTS) data sets and compared our findings with a series of numerical simulations that allowed the investigation of the influence of parameters representing different types of uncertainties: variability in the screening concentration (related to solution library and compound characteristics, liquid handling), variations in Hill model parameters (related to interaction of compounds with target, type of assay), and influences of assay data quality parameters (related to assay and experimental design, liquid handling). In the different sensitivity analyses, we found that the typical variations of the actual compound concentrations in existing screening libraries generate the largest contributions to imperfect correlations. Excess variability in the ENPP2 assay above the values of the simulation model can be explained by compound aggregation artifacts.

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3