Post-Pandemic Futures: Balancing Technological Optimism with Sociocultural Fairness

Author:

Atik Deniz1ORCID,Dholakia Nikhilesh2,Ozgun Aras3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Marketing, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Brownsville, Texas, USA

2. University of Rhode Island (URI), Kingston, Rhode Island, USA

3. Department of Cinema and Digital Media, Izmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected the geopolitical and sociocultural global systems. Despite massive setbacks, technological advancement has been a driving socio-economic force during the pandemic. In this study, we examine the future prospects associated with politico-cultural, socio-communal and techno-economic trends through a review of both scholarly literature and news sources. We aim to contribute to the current debates by offering a conceptual analysis that identifies the techno-economic trends as moving in ameliorative directions while the socio-political-cultural trends are moving in harmful directions, in terms of social justice and equitable development. The positive effects of technology over the lives of workers and consumers have become tangible particularly in the fields of communications and biotechnology, yet technological developments also enable large scale dissemination of misinformation and generate isolation and inequity. Public policymakers and private entities must boost their efforts for accelerating the positive changes that technologies can bring forth, and curbing their negative effects, in order to alleviate poverty and reduce inequity-worsening tendencies unleashed by the pandemic.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Business and International Management

Reference57 articles.

1. Understanding the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak on Grocery Stocking Behaviour in India: A Pattern Mining Approach

2. COVID-19 Pandemic: Inflicted Costs and Some Emerging Global Issues

3. Collective Narcissism, Anti-Globalism, Brexit, Trump, and the Chinese Juggernaut

4. Benito R. G. & Welch L. S. (1997). De-internationalization. MIR: Management International Review, 37(Special Issue), 7–25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40228430

5. Blumenthal D., Schneider E. C., Servai S. & Shah A. (2020, June 24). 3 scenarios for how the pandemic could change U.S. Health Care. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2020/07/3-scenarios-for-how-the-pandemic-could-change-u-s-health-care

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3