Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Economics, Universitas Internasional Batam, Indonesia.
2. Associate Professor & Deputy Dean (Research), Graduate School of Business, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.
Abstract
Good governance and accountability issues have become a serious concern in Indonesia after the economic crisis and subsequent political transition in 1998. Consequently, the Indonesian government has increasingly given attention to the application of performance measurement for the governmental agencies, including local authorities, as part of bureaucratic reform and good governance practices. The purpose of this article is to review the regulations and guidelines while examining issues and consequences of implementing performance measurement system in Indonesian local governments using descriptive and analytical methods based on secondary data. Although a performance measurement system has been implemented in Indonesia for 14 years, the results have been far from satisfactory. The Performance Management System (PMS) regulation is quite comprehensive, except it lacks a punishment and reward system. Some evidence demonstrates implementation issues such as lack of compliance, lack of integration between planning and budgeting, and inaccurate indicators and data reporting.
Subject
Business and International Management
Reference46 articles.
1. Uncovering the Political Philosophy of the New Public Management
2. AGA (2009). Governments’ use of performance measures to improve service delivery. AGA CPAG Research Series: Report No. 23.
3. Performance measurement in Indonesia: the case of local government
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献