Participant attributions for global change ratings in unexplained chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome

Abstract

The purpose of this mixed methods study was to identify participants’ attributions for their global impression of change ratings in a behavioral intervention for unexplained chronic fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome. At 3-month follow-up, participants ( N = 67) were asked “Why do you think you are (improved, unchanged, worse)?” Improved patients pointed to specific behavioral changes, unchanged patients referred to a lack of change in lifestyle, and worsened patients invoked stress and/or specific life events. Identifying patient perceptions of behaviors associated with patient global impression of change–rated improvement and non-improvement may assist in developing more effective management strategies in clinical care.