What drives the ‘August effect’? A observational study of the effect of junior doctor changeover on out of hours work

Author:

Blakey John D12,Fearn Andrew3,Shaw Dominick E4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK

2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK

3. Department of Information and Computer Technology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK

4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG5 1PB, UK

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether measurements of junior doctor on-call workload and performance can clarify the mechanisms underlying the increase in morbidity and mortality seen after junior doctor changeover: the ‘August effect’. Design Quantitative retrospective observational study of routinely collected data on junior doctor workload. Setting Two large teaching hospitals in England. Participants Task level data from a wireless out of hours system ( n = 29,885 requests) used by medical staff, nurses, and allied health professionals. Main outcome measures Number and type of tasks requested by nurses, time to completion of tasks by junior doctors. Results There was no overall change in the number of tasks requested by nurses out of hours around the August changeover (median requests per hour 15 before and 14 after, p = 0.46). However, the number of tasks classified as urgent was greater ( p = 0.016) equating to five more urgent tasks per day. After changeover, doctors took less time to complete tasks overall due to a reduction in time taken for routine tasks (median 74 vs. 66 min; p = 3.9 × 10−9). Conclusion This study suggests that the ‘August effect’ is not due to new junior doctors completing tasks more slowly or having a greater workload. Further studies are required to investigate the causes of the increased number of urgent tasks seen, but likely factors are errors, omissions, and poor prioritization. Thus, improved training and quality control has the potential to address this increased duration of unresolved patient risk. The study also highlights the potential of newer technologies to facilitate quantitative study of clinical activity.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3