Affiliation:
1. Department of Economics, Kustepe – Sisli 80310, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
Based on the multinomial logit estimates of an individual vote intention function, we perform restriction tests to make pairwise comparisons of the voter profiles of the major political parties in Turkey. The economic variables in the model are items that represent the well known hypotheses of economic voting theory, i.e. whether individuals vote retrospectively and/or prospectively, and whether they are sociotropic and/or pocketbook. The non-economic factors include socio-demographic characteristics as well as issues and identity variables that are likely to be good predictors of the party choice. In many cases, restriction tests provide evidence refuting the general view that the Turkish party system is artificially fragmented.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference7 articles.
1. Cagaptay, S. (2002) ‘The November 2002 Elections and Turkey’s New Political Era’ , Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal 6: 42–48 .
2. Carkoglu, A. (1998) ‘The Turkish Party System in Transition: Party Performance and Agenda Change’ , Political Studies XLVI: 544–571 .
3. Carkoglu, A. (2002) ‘Turkey’s November 2002 Elections: A New Beginning?’ , Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal 6: 30–41 .
4. Kalaycio.glu, E. (1997) ‘The Logic of Contemporary Turkish Politics’ , Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal 1(3),
5. The Shaping of Party Preferences in Turkey: Coping with the Post-Cold War Era
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献