Variability in Reporting eGFR at Dialysis Initiation in Canada: A Research Letter

Author:

Chiu Michael1ORCID,Silver Samuel A.2ORCID,Berall Laura3ORCID,Ethier Isabelle45,Harris Claire6,More Keigan7,Nadeau-Fredette Annie-Claire8ORCID,Tennankore Karthik7ORCID,Hingwala Jay9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada

2. Division of Nephrology, Kingston Health Sciences Center, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

3. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Humber River Hospital, Queen’s University, Toronto, ON, Canada

4. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

5. Health Innovation and Evaluation Hub, Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada

6. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Vancouver General Hospital, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

7. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada

8. Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

9. Division of Nephrology, Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada

Abstract

Background: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at dialysis initiation is increasingly recognized as a key quality indicator (QI) for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Specifically, guidelines recommend assessing deferral of dialysis initiation until symptoms arise or if the eGFR is ≤6 mL/min/1.73 m2. Despite the recognition of the importance of this QI, how eGFR at the time of dialysis initiation is defined, collected, and tracked at dialysis centers across Canada remains unknown. Objectives: To identify how provincial renal programs define eGFR at dialysis initiation, to compare practice across Canadian provinces, and to determine if there is a consistent benchmark for deferred dialysis start. Design: Cross-sectional survey distributed to the medical leads of each provincial renal program, administered from July 2021 to November 2021. Quebec was not included given it did not yet participate in Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR) data submission. Setting: The survey was designed and distributed by the Canadian Society of Nephrology Quality Improvement & Implementation Science Committee (CSN-QUIS) Indicator Working Group. Methods: The survey asked respondents on how eGFR is defined, collected, reported, and perceived barriers to QI data collection. The National Senior Renal Leaders Forum helped identify the key provincial medical leads to disseminate the survey for completion. Results: Surveys were distributed to the medical leads of the 9 provincial renal programs that participate in CORR. In total, there were 8 responses. Five provinces submit eGFR for all new dialysis starts and 3 provinces only submit this information for chronic patients. There is variation in determining when a patient with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis is classified as a chronic patient. Four provinces use a 30-day trigger, 3 provinces use a 90-day trigger, and the patient’s nephrologist makes this determination in 1 province. The creatinine used for the eGFR at dialysis initiation was the value measured on the first dialysis session (ie, day 0) for 5 provinces; the last outpatient clinic creatinine value in 2 provinces, and 1 province did not have a standard definition. Three provinces did not have a benchmark target for eGFR at dialysis initiation, 1 province had a target of <9.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, 3 provinces had a target of <10 mL/min/1.73 m2, 1 province had a target of <15 mL/min/1.73 m2. All 8 responding provincial medical leads support the establishment of a national benchmark for this measure. Limitations: This survey was restricted to provincial medical leads and therefore is unable to determine practice at individual dialysis sites. The survey was not anonymous, so it may be subject to conformity bias. Conclusions: There is wide variability in how eGFR at dialysis initiation is measured and reported across Canada. Additionally, there is no consensus on a benchmark target for an intent-to-defer dialysis strategy. Standardization of target eGFR at dialysis initiation may facilitate national reporting and quality improvement initiatives.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Nephrology

Reference10 articles.

1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Annual statistics on organ replacement in Canada, 2012 to 2021. https://www.cihi.ca/en/annual-statistics-on-organ-replacement-in-canada-2012-to-2021. Accessed February 28, 2023.

2. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis

3. Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Dialysis Early: A Randomized Controlled Trial

4. Timing of dialysis initiation to reduce mortality and cardiovascular events in advanced chronic kidney disease: nationwide cohort study

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3